Star Trek: Insurrection
|
IMDB rating: 6.40 Plot: Engage! Captain Jean-Luc Picard and his Next Generation crew are back. From the beginning of the Federation, the Prime Directive was clear: no Starfleet expedition may interfere with the natural development of other civilizations. But now Picard is confronted with orders that undermine that decree. If he obeys, 600 peaceful residents of Ba'ku will be forcibly removed from their remarkable world, all for the reportedly greater good of millions who will benefit from the Ba'ku's Fountain of Youth-like powers. If he disobeys, he will risk his Starship, his career, his life. But for Picard, there's really only one choice. He must rebel against Starfleet . . . and lead the insurrection to preserve Paradise. |
Download Star Trek: Insurrection
Actors: Stewart Patrick,Spiner Brent,Burton LeVar,Dorn Michael,Abraham F. Murray,Zerbe Anthony,Henry Gregg,Kelly Daniel Hugh,Welch Michael,Deakins Mark,Action,Adventure,Sci-Fi,Thriller,
Why does Nero from Star Trek look different from other Romulans?
In all of the other star trek TV shows, the romulans look mostly the same- but Nero looks way different. Why is this? The only thing I noticed that look the same are the romulans in Star Trek Insurrection- Is he like them?
From Memory Alpha: "Due to their shared ancestry, Vulcans and Romulans possessed very similar physiology. (...) Most Romulans had two brow ridges above the bridge of their nose, forming a V-shape on the forehead. However, a minority of Romulans lack these ridges, making them outwardly indistinguishable from Vulcans."
In the prequel comic Star Trek: Countdown, an explanation is given for the tattoos on Nero and his crew: "There was a tradition on Romulus that when a loved one died you would paint your grief upon your skin. Ancient symbols of love and loss. In time the paint would fade, and with it the period of mourning. Life would go on. We paint these symbols on our skin now. But we burn them deep. So that they will never fade. Because life does not go on. We died with our friends. We died with our families. We died with Romulus. And all that is left is revenge."
Hope that answers your question 
Teri | Jul 01, 2009
because the actor that plays Nero is Australian not British or Canadian.
hollywood | Jul 01, 2009
I suppose they wanted Nero to look different and to not just blend in because he's the bad guy and everybody has to know who the bad guy of the movie is... as time went on and the effects got better the aliens all started looking different (check out the Original Series' Klingons and compare them to how they look on all the other series) I guess since Insurrection came right before the new movie and is therefore it's closest living relative they're going to look more alike than Romulans from any other show/movie because there's not a huge make-up/effects gap between them.
Spock Fan | Jul 01, 2009
Were there any Romulans in the ST Insurrection movie? I remember the Romulans from The Original Star Trek series, and from Star Trek the Next Generation series. And the Romulans were much fiercer looking in TNG. They had more grooves in their faces and protruding foreheads, and a more deadly threatening demeanour, and quite frankly were more interesting and well developed within the plot than the original Star Trek Romulans. Especially the Tasha story for instance.
Nero looked like a guy with Tattoos, really peeved off mind you, but not the Romulans from any of the series, so you're right on in your observation in my opinion.
Tina Vashniche | Jul 01, 2009
The universe has been reimagined, some stuff will be different,
Also most of the Romulans we have seen before have been Military, and Nero and his ships crew were just civilian miners as he said out making an honest living. I would guess that before Spock messed up Romulus and Remus Nero and his guys may have been pretty normal and decent folk.
Loop | Jul 02, 2009
Star Trek: Insurrection
|
IMDB rating: 6.40 Plot: Engage! Captain Jean-Luc Picard and his Next Generation crew are back. From the beginning of the Federation, the Prime Directive was clear: no Starfleet expedition may interfere with the natural development of other civilizations. But now Picard is confronted with orders that undermine that decree. If he obeys, 600 peaceful residents of Ba'ku will be forcibly removed from their remarkable world, all for the reportedly greater good of millions who will benefit from the Ba'ku's Fountain of Youth-like powers. If he disobeys, he will risk his Starship, his career, his life. But for Picard, there's really only one choice. He must rebel against Starfleet . . . and lead the insurrection to preserve Paradise. |
Actors: Stewart Patrick,Spiner Brent,Burton LeVar,Dorn Michael,Abraham F. Murray,Zerbe Anthony,Henry Gregg,Kelly Daniel Hugh,Welch Michael,Deakins Mark,Action,Adventure,Sci-Fi,Thriller,
What was the best and the worst Star Trek movie?
Star Trek: The Original Motion Picture (1979)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991)
Star Trek: Generations (1994)
Star Trek: First Contact (1996)
Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)
Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)
Star Trek (2009)
Best
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
Worst
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989)
Woody B | May 27, 2009
worst: all of them D:
Suzy with an uzi? | May 27, 2009
I've always watched the series (all of em) and seen all the movie. Worst in my opinion was the Undiscovered Country. A few of them drug along and were stretched, but that one bore me to tears. Best I would have to give the nod to the original. Awesome effects for it's time with a great cast and cool little twist with the Voyager thing. I also liked the remake and how they were able to tip their hat to the original for trekies, but made it enjoyable for people that had never watched them before.
chonan_1999 | May 27, 2009
The Motion Picture was the worst. Read my review below.
stephenbisback | May 28, 2009
Dwayne Stein